Papers › Rethinking the Two-Stage Framework for Grounded Situation Recognition
Rethinking the Two-Stage Framework for Grounded Situation Recognition
Meng Wei, Long Chen, Wei Ji, Xiaoyu Yue, Tat-Seng Chua
Grounded Situation Recognition (GSR), i.e., recognizing the salient activity (or verb) category in an image (e.g., buying) and detecting all corresponding semantic roles (e.g., agent and goods), is an essential step towards "human-like" event understanding. Since each verb is associated with a specific set of semantic roles, all existing GSR methods resort to a two-stage framework: predicting the verb in the first stage and detecting the semantic roles in the second stage. However, there are obvious drawbacks in both stages: 1) The widely-used cross-entropy (XE) loss for object recognition is insufficient in verb classification due to the large intra-class variation and high inter-class similarity among daily activities. 2) All semantic roles are detected in an autoregressive manner, which fails to model the complex semantic relations between different roles. To this end, we propose a novel SituFormer for GSR which consists of a Coarse-to-Fine Verb Model (CFVM) and a Transformer-based Noun Model (TNM). CFVM is a two-step verb prediction model: a coarse-grained model trained with XE loss first proposes a set of verb candidates, and then a fine-grained model trained with triplet loss re-ranks these candidates with enhanced verb features (not only separable but also discriminative). TNM is a transformer-based semantic role detection model, which detects all roles parallelly. Owing to the global relation modeling ability and flexibility of the transformer decoder, TNM can fully explore the statistical dependency of the roles. Extensive validations on the challenging SWiG benchmark show that SituFormer achieves a new state-of-the-art performance with significant gains under various metrics. Code is available at https://github.com/kellyiss/SituFormer.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2112.05375")
Code
Syntology Ran 9 of 12 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · honoured contract; 6 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 12 samples from 1 repository, 9 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
12 samples harvested; 9 ran; 3 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 12 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from kellyiss/situformer. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
aa6da43d05cfaf65 · report
e0a06ded5d4f6c3c · report
ce749f837424dd8c · report
031b02fb990284ba · report
74f3f5c1bab38c14 · report
9be9e658b5bd688a · report
d5c2ac8ea46e788e · report
f46bad6811c75514 · report
05992505df9ef0cd · report
569e2388775fa1b7 · report
da89ce279ae764b6 · report
fe699ae8220daf07 · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grounded Situation Recognition | SWiG | SituFormer | Top-1 Verb | 44.2 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Grounded Situation Recognition | SWiG | SituFormer | Top-1 Verb & Grounded-Value | 29.22 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Grounded Situation Recognition | SWiG | SituFormer | Top-1 Verb & Value | 35.24 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Grounded Situation Recognition | SWiG | SituFormer | Top-5 Verbs | 71.21 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Grounded Situation Recognition | SWiG | SituFormer | Top-5 Verbs & Grounded-Value | 46 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Grounded Situation Recognition | SWiG | SituFormer | Top-5 Verbs & Value | 55.75 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Situation Recognition | imSitu | SituFormer | Top-1 Verb | 44.2 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Situation Recognition | imSitu | SituFormer | Top-1 Verb & Value | 35.24 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Situation Recognition | imSitu | SituFormer | Top-5 Verbs | 71.21 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Situation Recognition | imSitu | SituFormer | Top-5 Verbs & Value | 55.75 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections