Papers › Rethinking Data-Free Quantization as a Zero-Sum Game
Rethinking Data-Free Quantization as a Zero-Sum Game
Biao Qian, Yang Wang, Richang Hong, Meng Wang
Data-free quantization (DFQ) recovers the performance of quantized network (Q) without accessing the real data, but generates the fake sample via a generator (G) by learning from full-precision network (P) instead. However, such sample generation process is totally independent of Q, specialized as failing to consider the adaptability of the generated samples, i.e., beneficial or adversarial, over the learning process of Q, resulting into non-ignorable performance loss. Building on this, several crucial questions -- how to measure and exploit the sample adaptability to Q under varied bit-width scenarios? how to generate the samples with desirable adaptability to benefit the quantized network? -- impel us to revisit DFQ. In this paper, we answer the above questions from a game-theory perspective to specialize DFQ as a zero-sum game between two players -- a generator and a quantized network, and further propose an Adaptability-aware Sample Generation (AdaSG) method. Technically, AdaSG reformulates DFQ as a dynamic maximization-vs-minimization game process anchored on the sample adaptability. The maximization process aims to generate the sample with desirable adaptability, such sample adaptability is further reduced by the minimization process after calibrating Q for performance recovery. The Balance Gap is defined to guide the stationarity of the game process to maximally benefit Q. The theoretical analysis and empirical studies verify the superiority of AdaSG over the state-of-the-arts. Our code is available at https://github.com/hfutqian/AdaSG.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2302.09572")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
3 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from hfutqian/AdaSG. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
90726473320040cd · report
7abebca0a27284d4 · report
539a2a077aece389 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections