Papers › Response Ranking with Multi-types of Deep Interactive Representations in...

Response Ranking with Multi-types of Deep Interactive Representations in Retrieval-based Dialogues

17 Aug 2021ACM Transactions on Information Systems 2021 8archive 2025-07-28

Ruijian Xu, Chongyang Tao, Jiazhan Feng, Wei Wu, Rui Yan, Dongyan Zhao

Building an intelligent dialogue system with the ability to select a proper response according to a multi-turn context is challenging in three aspects: (1) the meaning of a context–response pair is built upon language units from multiple granularities (e.g., words, phrases, and sub-sentences, etc.); (2) local (e.g., a small window around a word) and long-range (e.g., words across the context and the response) dependencies may exist in dialogue data; and (3) the relationship between the context and the response candidate lies in multiple relevant semantic clues or relatively implicit semantic clues in some real cases. However, existing approaches usually encode the dialogue with mono-type representation and the interaction processes between the context and the response candidate are executed in a rather shallow manner, which may lead to an inadequate understanding of dialogue content and hinder the recognition of the semantic relevance between the context and response. To tackle these challenges, we propose a representation[K]-interaction[L]-matching framework that explores multiple types of deep interactive representations to build context-response matching models for response selection. Particularly, we construct different types of representations for utterance–response pairs and deepen them via alternate encoding and interaction. By this means, the model can handle the relation of neighboring elements, phrasal pattern, and long-range dependencies during the representation and make a more accurate prediction through multiple layers of interactions between the context–response pair. Experiment results on three public benchmarks indicate that the proposed model significantly outperforms previous conventional context-response matching models and achieve slightly better results than the BERT model for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based dialogue systems.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Conversational Response SelectionRetrieval

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Conversational Response Selection Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) WDMN R10@1 0.821 #12 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Conversational Response Selection Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) WDMN R10@2 0.911 #12 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Conversational Response Selection Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) WDMN R10@5 0.981 #12 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Conversational Response Selection Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) WDMN R2@1 0.957 #12 of 25 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

AdamAttentionAttention DropoutBERTDense ConnectionsDropoutLayer NormalizationLinear LayerLinear Warmup With Linear DecayMulti-Head AttentionResidual ConnectionSoftmaxWeight DecayWordPiece

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections