Papers › Response Ranking with Multi-types of Deep Interactive Representations in...
Response Ranking with Multi-types of Deep Interactive Representations in Retrieval-based Dialogues
Ruijian Xu, Chongyang Tao, Jiazhan Feng, Wei Wu, Rui Yan, Dongyan Zhao
Building an intelligent dialogue system with the ability to select a proper response according to a multi-turn context is challenging in three aspects: (1) the meaning of a context–response pair is built upon language units from multiple granularities (e.g., words, phrases, and sub-sentences, etc.); (2) local (e.g., a small window around a word) and long-range (e.g., words across the context and the response) dependencies may exist in dialogue data; and (3) the relationship between the context and the response candidate lies in multiple relevant semantic clues or relatively implicit semantic clues in some real cases. However, existing approaches usually encode the dialogue with mono-type representation and the interaction processes between the context and the response candidate are executed in a rather shallow manner, which may lead to an inadequate understanding of dialogue content and hinder the recognition of the semantic relevance between the context and response. To tackle these challenges, we propose a representation[K]-interaction[L]-matching framework that explores multiple types of deep interactive representations to build context-response matching models for response selection. Particularly, we construct different types of representations for utterance–response pairs and deepen them via alternate encoding and interaction. By this means, the model can handle the relation of neighboring elements, phrasal pattern, and long-range dependencies during the representation and make a more accurate prediction through multiple layers of interactions between the context–response pair. Experiment results on three public benchmarks indicate that the proposed model significantly outperforms previous conventional context-response matching models and achieve slightly better results than the BERT model for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based dialogue systems.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversational Response Selection | Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) | WDMN | R10@1 | 0.821 | #12 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Conversational Response Selection | Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) | WDMN | R10@2 | 0.911 | #12 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Conversational Response Selection | Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) | WDMN | R10@5 | 0.981 | #12 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Conversational Response Selection | Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) | WDMN | R2@1 | 0.957 | #12 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections