Papers › Residual Importance Weighted Transfer Learning For High-dimensional Linear Regression
Residual Importance Weighted Transfer Learning For High-dimensional Linear Regression
Junlong Zhao, Shengbin Zheng, Chenlei Leng
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Transfer learning is an emerging paradigm for leveraging multiple sources to improve the statistical inference on a single target. In this paper, we propose a novel approach named residual importance weighted transfer learning (RIW-TL) for high-dimensional linear models built on penalized likelihood. Compared to existing methods such as Trans-Lasso that selects sources in an all-in-all-out manner, RIW-TL includes samples via importance weighting and thus may permit more effective sample use. To determine the weights, remarkably RIW-TL only requires the knowledge of one-dimensional densities dependent on residuals, thus overcoming the curse of dimensionality of having to estimate high-dimensional densities in naive importance weighting. We show that the oracle RIW-TL provides a faster rate than its competitors and develop a cross-fitting procedure to estimate this oracle. We discuss variants of RIW-TL by adopting different choices for residual weighting. The theoretical properties of RIW-TL and its variants are established and compared with those of LASSO and Trans-Lasso. Extensive simulation and a real data analysis confirm its advantages.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections