Papers › Resfusion: Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models for Image Restoration Based on...

Resfusion: Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models for Image Restoration Based on Prior Residual Noise

25 Nov 2023arXiv:2311.14900archive 2025-07-28

Zhenning Shi, Haoshuai Zheng, Chen Xu, Changsheng Dong, Bin Pan, Xueshuo Xie, Along He, Tao Li, Huazhu Fu

Recently, research on denoising diffusion models has expanded its application to the field of image restoration. Traditional diffusion-based image restoration methods utilize degraded images as conditional input to effectively guide the reverse generation process, without modifying the original denoising diffusion process. However, since the degraded images already include low-frequency information, starting from Gaussian white noise will result in increased sampling steps. We propose Resfusion, a general framework that incorporates the residual term into the diffusion forward process, starting the reverse process directly from the noisy degraded images. The form of our inference process is consistent with the DDPM. We introduced a weighted residual noise, named resnoise, as the prediction target and explicitly provide the quantitative relationship between the residual term and the noise term in resnoise. By leveraging a smooth equivalence transformation, Resfusion determine the optimal acceleration step and maintains the integrity of existing noise schedules, unifying the training and inference processes. The experimental results demonstrate that Resfusion exhibits competitive performance on ISTD dataset, LOL dataset and Raindrop dataset with only five sampling steps. Furthermore, Resfusion can be easily applied to image generation and emerges with strong versatility. Our code and model are available at https://github.com/nkicsl/Resfusion.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2311.14900")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 5 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 5 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

nkicsl/resfusion officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchNOASSERTION report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
2ran
1unverified

Licence: 5 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from nkicsl/resfusion. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

GaussianResfusion_Restore nkicsl/resfusion/model/resfusion_restore.py official repository ran licence not identified · pointer only · 47f3b9645aea86ad · report
ddpm_x0_to_xt nkicsl/resfusion/model/resfusion_restore.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 94a0550dfbf98b13 · report
load_callbacks nkicsl/Resfusion/train_resfusion_restore.py official repository ran licence not identified · pointer only · 50326de403c25103 · report
resfusion_x0_to_xt nkicsl/resfusion/model/resfusion_restore.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 56227012350c7f6f · report
Scheduler nkicsl/resfusion/model/resfusion_restore.py official repository unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 1cad0fc7e63f7014 · report

Tasks

DenoisingImage GenerationImage RestorationLow-Light Image EnhancementShadow RemovalSingle Image Deraining

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Low-Light Image Enhancement LOL Resfusion Average PSNR 24.63 #21 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Low-Light Image Enhancement LOL Resfusion LPIPS 0.107 #21 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Low-Light Image Enhancement LOL Resfusion SSIM 0.860 #21 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal ISTD Resfusion MAE 4.81 #2 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Single Image Deraining Raindrop Resfusion PSNR 32.61 #2 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Single Image Deraining Raindrop Resfusion SSIM 0.938 #2 of 3 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Diffusion

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections