Papers › Reply to: Large-scale quantitative profiling of the Old English verse tradition
Reply to: Large-scale quantitative profiling of the Old English verse tradition
Petr Plecháč, Andrew Cooper, Benjamin Nagy, Artjoms Šela
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In Nature Human Behaviour 3/2019, an article was published entitled "Large-scale quantitative profiling of the Old English verse tradition" dealing with (besides other things) the question of the authorship of the Old English poem Beowulf. The authors provide various textual measurements that they claim present "serious obstacles to those who would advocate for composite authorship or scribal recomposition" (p. 565). In what follows we raise doubts about their methods and address serious errors in both their data and their code. We show that reliable stylometric methods actually identify significant stylistic heterogeneity in Beowulf. In what follows we discuss each method separately following the order of the original article.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections