Papers › Relaxation of the parameter independence assumption in the `bootComb` R package

Relaxation of the parameter independence assumption in the `bootComb` R package

9 Feb 2022arXiv:2202.04519links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Marc Yves Romain Henrion

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Background. The bootComb R package allows researchers to derive confidence intervals with correct target coverage for arbitrary combinations of arbitrary numbers of independently estimated parameters. Previous versions (< 1.1.0) of bootComb used independent bootstrap sampling and required that the parameters themselves are independent - an unrealistic assumption in some real-world applications. Findings. Using Gaussian copulas to define the dependence between parameters, the bootComb package has been extended to allow for dependent parameters. Implications. The updated bootComb package can now handle cases of dependent parameters, with users specifying a correlation matrix defining the dependence structure. While in practice it may be difficult to know the exact dependence structure between parameters, `bootComb` allows running sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of parameter dependence on the resulting confidence interval for the combined parameter. Availability. bootComb is available from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bootComb).

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections