Papers › Regret of Age-of-Information Bandits
Regret of Age-of-Information Bandits
Santosh Fatale, Kavya Bhandari, Urvidh Narula, Sharayu Moharir, Manjesh Kumar Hanawal
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We consider a system with a single source that measures/tracks a time-varying quantity and periodically attempts to report these measurements to a monitoring station. Each update from the source has to be scheduled on one of K available communication channels. The probability of success of each attempted communication is a function of the channel used. This function is unknown to the scheduler. The metric of interest is the Age-of-Information (AoI), formally defined as the time elapsed since the destination received the recent most update from the source. We model our scheduling problem as a variant of the multi-arm bandit problem with communication channels as arms. We characterize a lower bound on the AoI regret achievable by any policy and characterize the performance of UCB, Thompson Sampling, and their variants. Our analytical results show that UCB and Thompson sampling are order-optimal for AoI bandits. In addition, we propose novel policies which, unlike UCB and Thompson Sampling, use the current AoI to make scheduling decisions. Via simulations, we show the proposed AoI-aware policies outperform existing AoI-agnostic policies.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections