Papers › Reference-less Quality Estimation of Text Simplification Systems

Reference-less Quality Estimation of Text Simplification Systems

30 Jan 2019WS 2018 11arXiv:1901.10746archive 2025-07-28

Louis Martin, Samuel Humeau, Pierre-Emmanuel Mazaré, Antoine Bordes, Éric Villemonte de la Clergerie, Benoît Sagot

The evaluation of text simplification (TS) systems remains an open challenge. As the task has common points with machine translation (MT), TS is often evaluated using MT metrics such as BLEU. However, such metrics require high quality reference data, which is rarely available for TS. TS has the advantage over MT of being a monolingual task, which allows for direct comparisons to be made between the simplified text and its original version. In this paper, we compare multiple approaches to reference-less quality estimation of sentence-level text simplification systems, based on the dataset used for the QATS 2016 shared task. We distinguish three different dimensions: gram-maticality, meaning preservation and simplicity. We show that n-gram-based MT metrics such as BLEU and METEOR correlate the most with human judgment of grammaticality and meaning preservation, whereas simplicity is best evaluated by basic length-based metrics.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

facebookresearch/text-simplification-evaluation officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Machine TranslationSentenceText SimplificationTranslation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

TS

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections