Papers › Reducing Training Sample Memorization in GANs by Training with Memorization Rejection

Reducing Training Sample Memorization in GANs by Training with Memorization Rejection

21 Oct 2022arXiv:2210.12231archive 2025-07-28

Andrew Bai, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Wendy Kan, Hsuan-Tien Lin

Generative adversarial network (GAN) continues to be a popular research direction due to its high generation quality. It is observed that many state-of-the-art GANs generate samples that are more similar to the training set than a holdout testing set from the same distribution, hinting some training samples are implicitly memorized in these models. This memorization behavior is unfavorable in many applications that demand the generated samples to be sufficiently distinct from known samples. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether it is possible to reduce memorization without compromising the generation quality. In this paper, we propose memorization rejection, a training scheme that rejects generated samples that are near-duplicates of training samples during training. Our scheme is simple, generic and can be directly applied to any GAN architecture. Experiments on multiple datasets and GAN models validate that memorization rejection effectively reduces training sample memorization, and in many cases does not sacrifice the generation quality. Code to reproduce the experiment results can be found at https://github.com/jybai/MRGAN.

PaperPDFCode

Code

jybai/mrgan officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Memorization

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections