Papers › RedBit: An End-to-End Flexible Framework for Evaluating the Accuracy of Quantized CNNs

RedBit: An End-to-End Flexible Framework for Evaluating the Accuracy of Quantized CNNs

15 Jan 2023arXiv:2301.06193archive 2025-07-28

André Santos, João Dinis Ferreira, Onur Mutlu, Gabriel Falcao

In recent years, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have become the standard class of deep neural network for image processing, classification and segmentation tasks. However, the large strides in accuracy obtained by CNNs have been derived from increasing the complexity of network topologies, which incurs sizeable performance and energy penalties in the training and inference of CNNs. Many recent works have validated the effectiveness of parameter quantization, which consists in reducing the bit width of the network's parameters, to enable the attainment of considerable performance and energy efficiency gains without significantly compromising accuracy. However, it is difficult to compare the relative effectiveness of different quantization methods. To address this problem, we introduce RedBit, an open-source framework that provides a transparent, extensible and easy-to-use interface to evaluate the effectiveness of different algorithms and parameter configurations on network accuracy. We use RedBit to perform a comprehensive survey of five state-of-the-art quantization methods applied to the MNIST, CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets. We evaluate a total of 2300 individual bit width combinations, independently tuning the width of the network's weight and input activation parameters, from 32 bits down to 1 bit (e.g., 8/8, 2/2, 1/32, 1/1, for weights/activations). Upwards of 20000 hours of computing time in a pool of state-of-the-art GPUs were used to generate all the results in this paper. For 1-bit quantization, the accuracy losses for the MNIST, CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets range between [0.26%, 0.79%], [9.74%, 32.96%] and [10.86%, 47.36%] top-1, respectively. We actively encourage the reader to download the source code and experiment with RedBit, and to submit their own observed results to our public repository, available at https://github.com/IT-Coimbra/RedBit.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from it-coimbra/redbit. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections