Papers › REDACTOR: eFPGA Redaction for DNN Accelerator Security

REDACTOR: eFPGA Redaction for DNN Accelerator Security

30 Jan 2025arXiv:2501.18740links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Yazan Baddour, Ava Hedayatipour, Amin Rezaei

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

With the ever-increasing integration of artificial intelligence into daily life and the growing importance of well-trained models, the security of hardware accelerators supporting Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has become paramount. As a promising solution to prevent hardware intellectual property theft, eFPGA redaction has emerged. This technique selectively conceals critical components of the design, allowing authorized users to restore functionality post-fabrication by inserting the correct bitstream. In this paper, we explore the redaction of DNN accelerators using eFPGAs, from specification to physical design implementation. Specifically, we investigate the selection of critical DNN modules for redaction using both regular and fracturable look-up tables. We perform synthesis, timing verification, and place & route on redacted DNN accelerators. Furthermore, we evaluate the overhead of incorporating eFPGAs into DNN accelerators in terms of power, area, and delay, finding it reasonable given the security benefits.

PaperPDFCode

Code

cars-lab-repo/redactor officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections