Papers › Reconciliation k-median: Clustering with Non-Polarized Representatives
Reconciliation k-median: Clustering with Non-Polarized Representatives
Bruno Ordozgoiti, Aristides Gionis
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We propose a new variant of the k-median problem, where the objective function models not only the cost of assigning data points to cluster representatives, but also a penalty term for disagreement among the representatives. We motivate this novel problem by applications where we are interested in clustering data while avoiding selecting representatives that are too far from each other. For example, we may want to summarize a set of news sources, but avoid selecting ideologically-extreme articles in order to reduce polarization. To solve the proposed k-median formulation we adopt the local-search algorithm of Arya et al. We show that the algorithm provides a provable approximation guarantee, which becomes constant under an assumption on the minimum number of points for each cluster. We experimentally evaluate our problem formulation and proposed algorithm on datasets inspired by the motivating applications. In particular, we experiment with data extracted from Twitter, the US Congress voting records, and popular news sources. The results show that our objective can lead to choosing less polarized groups of representatives without significant loss in representation fidelity.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections