Papers › Receding Horizon Re-ordering of Multi-Agent Execution Schedules
Receding Horizon Re-ordering of Multi-Agent Execution Schedules
Alexander Berndt, Niels van Duijkeren, Luigi Palmieri, Alexander Kleiner, Tamás Keviczky
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The trajectory planning for a fleet of Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) on a roadmap is commonly referred to as the Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) problem, the solution to which dictates each AGV's spatial and temporal location until it reaches it's goal without collision. When executing MAPF plans in dynamic workspaces, AGVs can be frequently delayed, e.g., due to encounters with humans or third-party vehicles. If the remainder of the AGVs keeps following their individual plans, synchrony of the fleet is lost and some AGVs may pass through roadmap intersections in a different order than originally planned. Although this could reduce the cumulative route completion time of the AGVs, generally, a change in the original ordering can cause conflicts such as deadlocks. In practice, synchrony is therefore often enforced by using a MAPF execution policy employing, e.g., an Action Dependency Graph (ADG) to maintain ordering. To safely re-order without introducing deadlocks, we present the concept of the Switchable Action Dependency Graph (SADG). Using the SADG, we formulate a comparatively low-dimensional Mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP) that repeatedly re-orders AGVs in a recursively feasible manner, thus maintaining deadlock-free guarantees, while dynamically minimizing the cumulative route completion time of all AGVs. Various simulations validate the efficiency of our approach when compared to the original ADG method as well as robust MAPF solution approaches.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections