Papers › Realistic Evaluation of Transductive Few-Shot Learning
Realistic Evaluation of Transductive Few-Shot Learning
Olivier Veilleux, Malik Boudiaf, Pablo Piantanida, Ismail Ben Ayed
Transductive inference is widely used in few-shot learning, as it leverages the statistics of the unlabeled query set of a few-shot task, typically yielding substantially better performances than its inductive counterpart. The current few-shot benchmarks use perfectly class-balanced tasks at inference. We argue that such an artificial regularity is unrealistic, as it assumes that the marginal label probability of the testing samples is known and fixed to the uniform distribution. In fact, in realistic scenarios, the unlabeled query sets come with arbitrary and unknown label marginals. We introduce and study the effect of arbitrary class distributions within the query sets of few-shot tasks at inference, removing the class-balance artefact. Specifically, we model the marginal probabilities of the classes as Dirichlet-distributed random variables, which yields a principled and realistic sampling within the simplex. This leverages the current few-shot benchmarks, building testing tasks with arbitrary class distributions. We evaluate experimentally state-of-the-art transductive methods over 3 widely used data sets, and observe, surprisingly, substantial performance drops, even below inductive methods in some cases. Furthermore, we propose a generalization of the mutual-information loss, based on α-divergences, which can handle effectively class-distribution variations. Empirically, we show that our transductive α-divergence optimization outperforms state-of-the-art methods across several data sets, models and few-shot settings. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/oveilleux/Realistic_Transductive_Few_Shot.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2204.11181")
Code
Syntology Ran 6 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 10 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
10 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 10 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from oveilleux/realistic_transductive_few_shot. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
c2bb0431f66349c4 · report
9612cc426ca84971 · report
1e25337f3b8c7d05 · report
a611fe8fce609022 · report
da0a1da72474e584 · report
a03c85ae21c3b667 · report
e01d7f2363beb45a · report
6a236e22aa59cecc · report
fdf1fa9384ed9dcb · report
e6a5040deda27fed · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Few-Shot Image Classification | Dirichlet CUB-200 (5-way, 1-shot) | \alpha-TIM | 1:1 Accuracy | 75.7 | #2 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Few-Shot Image Classification | Dirichlet CUB-200 (5-way, 5-shot) | \alpha-TIM | 1:1 Accuracy | 89.8 | #2 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Few-Shot Image Classification | Dirichlet Mini-Imagenet (5-way, 1-shot) | \alpha-TIM | 1:1 Accuracy | 67.4 | #2 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Few-Shot Image Classification | Dirichlet Mini-Imagenet (5-way, 5-shot) | \alpha-TIM | 1:1 Accuracy | 82.5 | #2 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Few-Shot Image Classification | Dirichlet Tiered-Imagenet (5-way, 1-shot) | \alpha-TIM | 1:1 Accuracy | 74.4 | #3 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Few-Shot Image Classification | Dirichlet Tiered-Imagenet (5-way, 5-shot) | \alpha-TIM | 1:1 Accuracy | 86.6 | #1 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections