Papers › Readers vs. Writers vs. Texts: Coping with Different Perspectives of Text...

Readers vs. Writers vs. Texts: Coping with Different Perspectives of Text Understanding in Emotion Annotation

1 Apr 2017WS 2017 4archive 2025-07-28

Sven Buechel, Udo Hahn

We here examine how different perspectives of understanding written discourse, like the reader{'}s, the writer{'}s or the text{'}s point of view, affect the quality of emotion annotations. We conducted a series of annotation experiments on two corpora, a popular movie review corpus and a genre- and domain-balanced corpus of standard English. We found statistical evidence that the writer{'}s perspective yields superior annotation quality overall. However, the quality one perspective yields compared to the other(s) seems to depend on the domain the utterance originates from. Our data further suggest that the popular movie review data set suffers from an atypical bimodal distribution which may decrease model performance when used as a training resource.

PaperPDFCode

Code

JULIELab/EmoBank officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Reading Comprehension

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections