Papers › Rank the Episodes: A Simple Approach for Exploration in Procedurally-Generated Environments
Rank the Episodes: A Simple Approach for Exploration in Procedurally-Generated Environments
Daochen Zha, Wenye Ma, Lei Yuan, Xia Hu, Ji Liu
Exploration under sparse reward is a long-standing challenge of model-free reinforcement learning. The state-of-the-art methods address this challenge by introducing intrinsic rewards to encourage exploration in novel states or uncertain environment dynamics. Unfortunately, methods based on intrinsic rewards often fall short in procedurally-generated environments, where a different environment is generated in each episode so that the agent is not likely to visit the same state more than once. Motivated by how humans distinguish good exploration behaviors by looking into the entire episode, we introduce RAPID, a simple yet effective episode-level exploration method for procedurally-generated environments. RAPID regards each episode as a whole and gives an episodic exploration score from both per-episode and long-term views. Those highly scored episodes are treated as good exploration behaviors and are stored in a small ranking buffer. The agent then imitates the episodes in the buffer to reproduce the past good exploration behaviors. We demonstrate our method on several procedurally-generated MiniGrid environments, a first-person-view 3D Maze navigation task from MiniWorld, and several sparse MuJoCo tasks. The results show that RAPID significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art intrinsic reward strategies in terms of sample efficiency and final performance. The code is available at https://github.com/daochenzha/rapid
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2101.08152")
Code
Syntology Ran 14 of 28 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 14 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 9 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 5 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran; community (archive-listed): 23 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
28 samples harvested; 14 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 14 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 28 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
d6eaff6eabe8943b · report
8758308dc6c0727f · report
1bd23d9c5df7763c · report
baf2a28d376d7803 · report
c0f83827d6c75fca · report
ad5584bf82eab7fe · report
978c689ae69157a3 · report
242a79b49bc8f5de · report
081800d1f215fd82 · report
ecaf9ce3efa32820 · report
6f9580f36835d52d · report
f0b5e724afa08592 · report
19fa70dab4a7056f · report
3c4301eba0f1aaf2 · report
8b7334946d2ed532 · report
b21a3fc9290718d4 · report
0c58056d576d9ba8 · report
efd67c7b09262d14 · report
b18fdb2df2966f99 · report
07d722b0c7f269f6 · report
5b226f8121d5718b · report
819a51a05cef8459 · report
b5664e29a5753d3d · report
e22453516d7e1e51 · report
13289659b2b68f4f · report
420a7935bc54a351 · report
8db9834e56303b87 · report
cbb527600328539c · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections