Papers › QUILL: Quotation Generation Enhancement of Large Language Models

QUILL: Quotation Generation Enhancement of Large Language Models

6 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.03675archive 2025-07-28

Jin Xiao, Bowei Zhang, Qianyu He, Jiaqing Liang, Feng Wei, Jinglei Chen, Zujie Liang, Deqing Yang, Yanghua Xiao

While Large language models (LLMs) have become excellent writing assistants, they still struggle with quotation generation. This is because they either hallucinate when providing factual quotations or fail to provide quotes that exceed human expectations. To bridge the gap, we systematically study how to evaluate and improve LLMs' performance in quotation generation tasks. We first establish a holistic and automatic evaluation system for quotation generation task, which consists of five criteria each with corresponding automatic metric. To improve the LLMs' quotation generation abilities, we construct a bilingual knowledge base that is broad in scope and rich in dimensions, containing up to 32,022 quotes. Moreover, guided by our critiria, we further design a quotation-specific metric to rerank the retrieved quotations from the knowledge base. Extensive experiments show that our metrics strongly correlate with human preferences. Existing LLMs struggle to generate desired quotes, but our quotation knowledge base and reranking metric help narrow this gap. Our dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/GraceXiaoo/QUILL.

PaperPDFCode

Code

gracexiaoo/quill officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Reranking

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

BASE

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections