Papers › A Comparison of Deep-Learning Methods for Analysing and Predicting Business Processes

A Comparison of Deep-Learning Methods for Analysing and Predicting Business Processes

11 Feb 2021arXiv:2102.07838archive 2025-07-28

Ishwar Venugopal, Jessica Töllich, Michael Fairbank, Ansgar Scherp

Deep-learning models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) have been successfully used for process-mining tasks. They have achieved better performance for different predictive tasks than traditional approaches. We extend the existing body of research by testing four different variants of Graph Neural Networks (GNN) and a fully connected Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) with dropout for the tasks of predicting the nature and timestamp of the next process activity. In contrast to existing studies, we evaluate our models' performance at different stages of a process, determined by quartiles of the number of events and normalized quarters of the case duration. This provides new insights into the performance of a prediction model, as they behave differently at different stages of a business-process. Interestingly, our experiments show that the simple MLP often outperforms more sophisticated deep-learning models in both prediction tasks. We argue that care needs to be taken when applying automated process-prediction techniques at different stages of a process. We further argue that researchers should reflect their results with strong baselines methods like simple MLPs.

PaperPDFCode

Code

ishwarvenugopal/gcn-process-mining officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
ishwarvenugopal/GCN-ProcessPrediction officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Prediction

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

DropoutGCN

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections