Papers › Quantum Pattern Detection: Accurate State- and Circuit-based Analyses
Quantum Pattern Detection: Accurate State- and Circuit-based Analyses
Julian Shen, Joshua Ammermann, Christoph König, Ina Schaefer
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Quantum computers have the potential to solve certain problems faster than classical computers by exploiting quantum mechanical effects such as superposition. However, building high-quality quantum software is challenging due to the fundamental differences between quantum and traditional programming and the lack of abstraction mechanisms. To mitigate this challenge, researchers have introduced quantum patterns to capture common high-level design solutions to recurring problems in quantum software engineering. In order to utilize patterns as an abstraction level for implementation, a mapping between the theoretical patterns and the source code is required, which has only been addressed to a limited extent. To close this gap, we propose a framework for the automatic detection of quantum patterns using state- and circuit-based code analysis. Furthermore, we contribute a dataset for benchmarking quantum pattern detection approaches. In an empirical evaluation, we show that our framework is able to detect quantum patterns very accurately and that it outperforms existing quantum pattern detection approaches in terms of detection accuracy.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections