Papers › Quantifying uncertainty in spikes estimated from calcium imaging data
Quantifying uncertainty in spikes estimated from calcium imaging data
Yiqun T. Chen, Sean W. Jewell, Daniela M. Witten
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In recent years, a number of methods have been proposed to estimate the times at which a neuron spikes on the basis of calcium imaging data. However, quantifying the uncertainty associated with these estimated spikes remains an open problem. We consider a simple and well-studied model for calcium imaging data, which states that calcium decays exponentially in the absence of a spike, and instantaneously increases when a spike occurs. We wish to test the null hypothesis that the neuron did not spike -- i.e., that there was no increase in calcium -- at a particular timepoint at which a spike was estimated. In this setting, classical hypothesis tests lead to inflated Type I error, because the spike was estimated on the same data used for testing. To overcome this problem, we propose a selective inference approach. We describe an efficient algorithm to compute finite-sample p-values that control selective Type I error, and confidence intervals with correct selective coverage, for spikes estimated using a recent proposal from the literature. We apply our proposal in simulation and on calcium imaging data from the spikefinder challenge.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections