Papers › Quantifying uncertainty and stability among highly correlated predictors: a subspace...

Quantifying uncertainty and stability among highly correlated predictors: a subspace perspective

10 May 2025arXiv:2505.06760links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Xiaozhu Zhang, Jacob Bien, Armeen Taeb

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We study the problem of linear feature selection when features are highly correlated. Such settings pose two fundamental challenges. First, how should model similarity be defined? Simply counting features in common can be misleading: two models may share no features, yet highly correlated features can make the two models very similar in terms of predictive ability. Second, how can feature stability be assessed across runs of a variable selection method? High correlation can yield very different feature sets, so counting how often a feature is selected may label most features as unstable, and selecting stable features would result in models that are too small with poor predictive performance. In essence, these issues arise because existing notions of similarity and stability are "discrete" in nature. To overcome these challenges, we propose a novel framework based on feature subspaces -- the subspaces spanned by selected columns of the feature matrix. This new perspective leads to "continuous" measures of similarity and stability, as well as false positive error, all of which are defined in terms of "closeness" of feature subspaces. Our measures naturally account for feature correlation and reduce to existing discrete notions when features are uncorrelated. To obtain stable models, we propose and theoretically analyze a subspace-based generalization of stability selection (Meinshausen & B\"uhlmann 2010, Taeb et al. 2020), which combines a discrete model search with a continuous subspace-based assessment of stability. On synthetic and real gene expression data, our method improves on existing stability-based approaches by (i) producing multiple stable models that capture feature interchangeability, and (ii) generating larger models with better predictive performance. Our method is implemented in the R package substab.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections