Papers › Quadratic Fields Admitting Elliptic Curves with Rational j-Invariant and Good...

Quadratic Fields Admitting Elliptic Curves with Rational j-Invariant and Good Reduction Everywhere

17 Mar 2021arXiv:2103.09814links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Benjamin Matschke, Abhijit S. Mudigonda

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Clemm and Trebat-Leder (2014) proved that the number of quadratic number fields with absolute discriminant bounded by x over which there exist elliptic curves with good reduction everywhere and rational j-invariant is ≫xlog^(-1/2)(x). In this paper, we assume the abc-conjecture to show the sharp asymptotic ∼cxlog^(-1/2)(x) for this number, obtaining formulae for c in both the real and imaginary cases. Our method has three ingredients: (1) We make progress towards a conjecture of Granville: Given a fixed elliptic curve E/ℚ with short Weierstrass equation y² = f(x) for reducible f ∈ℤ[x], we show that the number of integers d, |d| ≤D, for which the quadratic twist dy² = f(x) has an integral non-$2$-torsion point is at most D^(2/3+o(1)), assuming the abc-conjecture. (2) We apply the Selberg--Delange method to obtain a Tauberian theorem which allows us to count integers satisfying certain congruences while also being divisible only by certain primes. (3) We show that for a polynomially sparse subset of the natural numbers, the number of pairs of elements with least common multiple at most x is O(x^(1-ϵ)) for some ϵ> 0. We also exhibit a matching lower bound. If instead of the abc-conjecture we assume a particular tail bound, we can prove all the aforementioned results and that the coefficient c above is greater in the real quadratic case than in the imaginary quadratic case, in agreement with an experimentally observed bias.

PaperPDFCode

Code

abhijit-mudigonda/everywhere-good-reduction officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections