Papers › QPack Scores: Quantitative performance metrics for application-oriented quantum...
QPack Scores: Quantitative performance metrics for application-oriented quantum computer benchmarking
Huub Donkers, Koen Mesman, Zaid Al-Ars, Matthias Möller
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
This paper presents the benchmark score definitions of QPack, an application-oriented cross-platform benchmarking suite for quantum computers and simulators, which makes use of scalable Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and Variational Quantum Eigensolver applications. Using a varied set of benchmark applications, an insight of how well a quantum computer or its simulator performs on a general NISQ-era application can be quantitatively made. This paper presents what quantum execution data can be collected and transformed into benchmark scores for application-oriented quantum benchmarking. Definitions are given for an overall benchmark score, as well as sub-scores based on runtime, accuracy, scalability and capacity performance. Using these scores, a comparison is made between various quantum computer simulators, running both locally and on vendors' remote cloud services. We also use the QPack benchmark to collect a small set of quantum execution data of the IBMQ Nairobi quantum processor. The goal of the QPack benchmark scores is to give a holistic insight into quantum performance and the ability to make easy and quick comparisons between different quantum computers
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections