Papers › Pruning and Slicing Neural Networks using Formal Verification
Pruning and Slicing Neural Networks using Formal Verification
Ori Lahav, Guy Katz
Deep neural networks (DNNs) play an increasingly important role in various computer systems. In order to create these networks, engineers typically specify a desired topology, and then use an automated training algorithm to select the network's weights. While training algorithms have been studied extensively and are well understood, the selection of topology remains a form of art, and can often result in networks that are unnecessarily large - and consequently are incompatible with end devices that have limited memory, battery or computational power. Here, we propose to address this challenge by harnessing recent advances in DNN verification. We present a framework and a methodology for discovering redundancies in DNNs - i.e., for finding neurons that are not needed, and can be removed in order to reduce the size of the DNN. By using sound verification techniques, we can formally guarantee that our simplified network is equivalent to the original, either completely, or up to a prescribed tolerance. Further, we show how to combine our technique with slicing, which results in a family of very small DNNs, which are together equivalent to the original. Our approach can produce DNNs that are significantly smaller than the original, rendering them suitable for deployment on additional kinds of systems, and even more amenable to subsequent formal verification. We provide a proof-of-concept implementation of our approach, and use it to evaluate our techniques on several real-world DNNs.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections