Papers › Proxy Indicators for the Quality of Open-domain Dialogues

Proxy Indicators for the Quality of Open-domain Dialogues

1 Nov 2021EMNLP 2021 11archive 2025-07-28

Rostislav Nedelchev, Jens Lehmann, Ricardo Usbeck

The automatic evaluation of open-domain dialogues remains a largely unsolved challenge. Despite the abundance of work done in the field, human judges have to evaluate dialogues’ quality. As a consequence, performing such evaluations at scale is usually expensive. This work investigates using a deep-learning model trained on the General Language Understanding Evaluation (GLUE) benchmark to serve as a quality indication of open-domain dialogues. The aim is to use the various GLUE tasks as different perspectives on judging the quality of conversation, thus reducing the need for additional training data or responses that serve as quality references. Due to this nature, the method can infer various quality metrics and can derive a component-based overall score. We achieve statistically significant correlation coefficients of up to 0.7.

PaperPDFCode

Code

smartdataanalytics/proxy_indicators officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Dialogue Evaluation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Dialogue Evaluation USR-PersonaChat Lin-Reg (all) Pearson Correlation 0.5290 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Dialogue Evaluation USR-PersonaChat Lin-Reg (all) Spearman Correlation 0.5382 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Dialogue Evaluation USR-TopicalChat Lin-Reg (all) Pearson Correlation 0.4974 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Dialogue Evaluation USR-TopicalChat Lin-Reg (all) Spearman Correlation 0.4877 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections