Papers › Proximity Operators for Phase Retrieval

Proximity Operators for Phase Retrieval

27 Oct 2017arXiv:1710.10046links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Ferréol Soulez, Éric Thiébaut, Antony Schutz, André Ferrari, Frédéric Courbin, Michael Unser

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We present a new formulation of a family of proximity operators that generalize the projector step for phase retrieval. These proximity operators for noisy intensity measurements can replace the classical "noise free" projection in any projection-based algorithm. They are derived from a maximum likelihood formulation and admit closed form solutions for both the Gaussian and the Poisson cases. In addition, we extend these proximity operators to undersampled intensity measurements. To assess their performance, these operators are exploited in a classical Gerchberg Saxton algorithm. We present numerical experiments showing that the reconstructed complex amplitudes with these proximity operators perform always better than using the classical intensity projector while their computational overhead is moderate.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections