Papers › ProVision: Programmatically Scaling Vision-centric Instruction Data for Multimodal...

ProVision: Programmatically Scaling Vision-centric Instruction Data for Multimodal Language Models

9 Dec 2024arXiv:2412.07012archive 2025-07-28

Jieyu Zhang, Le Xue, Linxin Song, Jun Wang, Weikai Huang, Manli Shu, An Yan, Zixian Ma, Juan Carlos Niebles, Silvio Savarese, Caiming Xiong, Zeyuan Chen, Ranjay Krishna, ran Xu

With the rise of multimodal applications, instruction data has become critical for training multimodal language models capable of understanding complex image-based queries. Existing practices rely on powerful but costly large language models (LLMs) or multimodal language models (MLMs) to produce instruction data. These are often prone to hallucinations, licensing issues and the generation process is often hard to scale and interpret. In this work, we present a programmatic approach that employs scene graphs as symbolic representations of images and human-written programs to systematically synthesize vision-centric instruction data. Our approach ensures the interpretability and controllability of the data generation process and scales efficiently while maintaining factual accuracy. By implementing a suite of 24 single-image, 14 multi-image instruction generators, and a scene graph generation pipeline, we build a scalable, cost-effective system: ProVision which produces diverse question-answer pairs concerning objects, attributes, relations, depth, etc., for any given image. Applied to Visual Genome and DataComp datasets, we generate over 10 million instruction data points, ProVision-10M, and leverage them in both pretraining and instruction tuning stages of MLMs. When adopted in the instruction tuning stage, our single-image instruction data yields up to a 7% improvement on the 2D split and 8% on the 3D split of CVBench, along with a 3% increase in performance on QBench2, RealWorldQA, and MMMU. Our multi-image instruction data leads to an 8% improvement on Mantis-Eval. Incorporation of our data in both pre-training and fine-tuning stages of xGen-MM-4B leads to an averaged improvement of 1.6% across 11 benchmarks.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2412.07012")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 15 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 15 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 15 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

jieyuz2/provision officialmentioned in paperpytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

15 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 15 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

15unverified

Licence: 0 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from jieyuz2/provision. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

boxOverlap jieyuz2/provision/provision/dataset.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 1b9b3ba31d9f08f9 · report
cate_grounding jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/relation_grounding.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 7f28431ff5823dfe · report
depth_estimation jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/depth_estimation.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 7a269cd987117ade · report
get_attributes jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/attribute_llava.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3010b213fcb650e6 · report
get_image jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 4354809003526c37 · report
load_image jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/attribute_llava.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 5f90221712cb63f4 · report
normalize_attributes jieyuz2/provision/provision/dataset.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a72c327b29ab95e1 · report
normalize_relations jieyuz2/provision/provision/dataset.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3cfade61c1d29398 · report
object_detection jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/object_detection.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a13bc543209b74ab · report
rel_parsing jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/relation_grounding.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a1e26f63b595bca0 · report
sam_mask_generation jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/segmentation.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · f69b840efc02bd76 · report
sam_mask_prediction jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/segmentation.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 8b3900eb71dae6ba · report
save_depth_res jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/depth_estimation.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 9008ca38b586fa68 · report
save_mask_as_png jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · b67cc1d3454644b8 · report
save_sep_mask jieyuz2/provision/provision/annotation/utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 2ac58005d7f320e4 · report

Tasks

Graph GenerationScene Graph GenerationVisual Question Answering

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Visual Question Answering MM-Vet LLaVA-1.5-7B (VG-S) GPT-4 score 40.4 #107 of 231 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering MM-Vet LLaVA-1.5-7B (DC-S) GPT-4 score 38.5 #123 of 231 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections