Papers › Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Points

Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Points

4 Feb 2021arXiv:2102.02400archive 2025-07-28

Xuefeng Li, Tongliang Liu, Bo Han, Gang Niu, Masashi Sugiyama

In label-noise learning, the transition matrix plays a key role in building statistically consistent classifiers. Existing consistent estimators for the transition matrix have been developed by exploiting anchor points. However, the anchor-point assumption is not always satisfied in real scenarios. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end framework for solving label-noise learning without anchor points, in which we simultaneously optimize two objectives: the cross entropy loss between the noisy label and the predicted probability by the neural network, and the volume of the simplex formed by the columns of the transition matrix. Our proposed framework can identify the transition matrix if the clean class-posterior probabilities are sufficiently scattered. This is by far the mildest assumption under which the transition matrix is provably identifiable and the learned classifier is statistically consistent. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Learning with noisy labels

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-100N VolMinNet Accuracy (mean) 57.80 #15 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Aggregate VolMinNet Accuracy (mean) 89.70 #21 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random1 VolMinNet Accuracy (mean) 88.30 #21 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random2 VolMinNet Accuracy (mean) 88.27 #18 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random3 VolMinNet Accuracy (mean) 88.19 #18 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Worst VolMinNet Accuracy (mean) 80.53 #21 of 25 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections