Papers › Proper evaluation of spatially correlated noise in interferometric images

Proper evaluation of spatially correlated noise in interferometric images

26 Jul 2022arXiv:2207.12588links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Takafumi Tsukui, Satoru Iguchi, Ikki Mitsuhashi, Kenichi Tadaki

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Recent interferometers (e.g. ALMA and NOEMA) allow us to obtain the detailed brightness distribution of the astronomical sources in 3 dimension (R.A., Dec., frequency). However, the interpixel correlation of the noise due to the limited uv coverage makes it difficult to evaluate the statistical uncertainty of the measured quantities and the statistical significance of the obtained results. The noise correlation properties are characterized by the noise autocorrelation function (ACF). We will present the method for (1) estimating the statistical uncertainty due to the correlated noise in the spatially integrated flux and spectra directly from the noise ACF and (2) simulating the correlated noise to perform a Monte Carlo simulation in image analyses. Our method has potential applications to a range of astronomical images of not only interferometers but also single dish mapping observation and interpolated and resampled optical images.

PaperPDFCode

Code

takafumi291/essence officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections