Papers › Prompting Language-Informed Distribution for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning

Prompting Language-Informed Distribution for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning

23 May 2023arXiv:2305.14428archive 2025-07-28

Wentao Bao, Lichang Chen, Heng Huang, Yu Kong

Compositional zero-shot learning (CZSL) task aims to recognize unseen compositional visual concepts, e.g., sliced tomatoes, where the model is learned only from the seen compositions, e.g., sliced potatoes and red tomatoes. Thanks to the prompt tuning on large pre-trained visual language models such as CLIP, recent literature shows impressively better CZSL performance than traditional vision-based methods. However, the key aspects that impact the generalization to unseen compositions, including the diversity and informativeness of class context, and the entanglement between visual primitives, i.e., state and object, are not properly addressed in existing CLIP-based CZSL literature. In this paper, we propose a model by prompting the language-informed distribution, aka., PLID, for the CZSL task. Specifically, the PLID leverages pre-trained large language models (LLM) to (i) formulate the language-informed class distributions which are diverse and informative, and (ii) enhance the compositionality of the class embedding. Moreover, a visual-language primitive decomposition (VLPD) module is proposed to dynamically fuse the classification decisions from the compositional and the primitive space. Orthogonal to the existing literature of soft, hard, or distributional prompts, our method advocates prompting the LLM-supported class distributions, leading to a better zero-shot generalization. Experimental results on MIT-States, UT-Zappos, and C-GQA datasets show the superior performance of the PLID to the prior arts. Our code and models are released: https://github.com/Cogito2012/PLID.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2305.14428")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

cogito2012/plid officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchBSD-3-Clause report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran · our draft was wrong
5unverified

Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from cogito2012/plid. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

kernelMatrixGaussian cogito2012/plid/models/hsic.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · 160bb5f66cd8558e · report
kernelMatrixLinear cogito2012/plid/models/hsic.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · 9ff5c4ac3b4e9b35 · report
pairwise_distances cogito2012/plid/models/hsic.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · 21bf8deeec959d90 · report
decompose_texts cogito2012/plid/models/losses.py official repository unverified BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · 4f8ed975b63f1ee7 · report
get_text_representations cogito2012/plid/evaluate.py official repository unverified BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · c888066e5cdf0438 · report
load_feasibilities cogito2012/plid/evaluate.py official repository unverified BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · 284a5e2bf37a9aff · report
upperbound_group_logits cogito2012/plid/models/losses.py official repository unverified BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · b9ea6f47549f58c9 · report
upperbound_logits cogito2012/plid/models/losses.py official repository unverified BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · 56ed2be1f48ae4e6 · report

Tasks

Compositional Zero-Shot LearningInformativenessZero-Shot LearningZero-shot Generalization

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

CLIPMixup

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections