Papers › Prompt Tuning for Generative Multimodal Pretrained Models

Prompt Tuning for Generative Multimodal Pretrained Models

4 Aug 2022arXiv:2208.02532archive 2025-07-28

Hao Yang, Junyang Lin, An Yang, Peng Wang, Chang Zhou, Hongxia Yang

Prompt tuning has become a new paradigm for model tuning and it has demonstrated success in natural language pretraining and even vision pretraining. In this work, we explore the transfer of prompt tuning to multimodal pretraining, with a focus on generative multimodal pretrained models, instead of contrastive ones. Specifically, we implement prompt tuning on the unified sequence-to-sequence pretrained model adaptive to both understanding and generation tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that the light-weight prompt tuning can achieve comparable performance with finetuning and surpass other light-weight tuning methods. Besides, in comparison with finetuned models, the prompt-tuned models demonstrate improved robustness against adversarial attacks. We further figure out that experimental factors, including the prompt length, prompt depth, and reparameteratization, have great impacts on the model performance, and thus we empirically provide a recommendation for the setups of prompt tuning. Despite the observed advantages, we still find some limitations in prompt tuning, and we correspondingly point out the directions for future studies. Codes are available at \url{https://github.com/OFA-Sys/OFA}

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2208.02532")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 0 repositories linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract.

By repository: 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

ofa-sys/ofa officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

apply_half identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · honoured contract fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · 357d3a4f0be679d9 · report

Tasks

Image CaptioningVisual EntailmentVisual Question Answering (VQA)

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Captioning COCO Captions Prompt Tuning BLEU-4 41.81 #10 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning COCO Captions Prompt Tuning CIDER 141.4 #10 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning COCO Captions Prompt Tuning METEOR 31.51 #10 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning COCO Captions Prompt Tuning SPICE 24.42 #10 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Entailment SNLI-VE test Prompt Tuning Accuracy 90.12 #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Entailment SNLI-VE val Prompt Tuning Accuracy 90.04 #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering (VQA) VQA v2 test-std Prompt Tuning overall 78.53 #10 of 38 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections