Papers › Prompt Guided Transformer for Multi-Task Dense Prediction
Prompt Guided Transformer for Multi-Task Dense Prediction
Yuxiang Lu, Shalayiding Sirejiding, Yue Ding, Chunlin Wang, Hongtao Lu
Task-conditional architecture offers advantage in parameter efficiency but falls short in performance compared to state-of-the-art multi-decoder methods. How to trade off performance and model parameters is an important and difficult problem. In this paper, we introduce a simple and lightweight task-conditional model called Prompt Guided Transformer (PGT) to optimize this challenge. Our approach designs a Prompt-conditioned Transformer block, which incorporates task-specific prompts in the self-attention mechanism to achieve global dependency modeling and parameter-efficient feature adaptation across multiple tasks. This block is integrated into both the shared encoder and decoder, enhancing the capture of intra- and inter-task features. Moreover, we design a lightweight decoder to further reduce parameter usage, which accounts for only 2.7% of the total model parameters. Extensive experiments on two multi-task dense prediction benchmarks, PASCAL-Context and NYUD-v2, demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art results among task-conditional methods while using fewer parameters, and maintains a significant balance between performance and parameter size.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boundary Detection | NYU-Depth V2 | PGT (Swin-S) | odsF | 78.04 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Boundary Detection | NYU-Depth V2 | PGT (Swin-T) | odsF | 77.05 | #3 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Monocular Depth Estimation | NYU-Depth V2 | PGT (Swin-S) | RMSE | 0.5468 | #77 of 85 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Monocular Depth Estimation | NYU-Depth V2 | PGT (Swin-T) | RMSE | 0.59 | #82 of 85 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | NYU Depth v2 | PGT (Swin-S) | Mean IoU | 46.43 | #90 of 121 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Segmentation | NYU Depth v2 | PGT (Swin-T) | Mean IoU | 41.61 | #106 of 121 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections