Papers › Prompt engineering and its implications on the energy consumption of Large Language Models
Prompt engineering and its implications on the energy consumption of Large Language Models
Riccardo Rubei, Aicha Moussaid, Claudio di Sipio, Davide di Ruscio
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Reducing the environmental impact of AI-based software systems has become critical. The intensive use of large language models (LLMs) in software engineering poses severe challenges regarding computational resources, data centers, and carbon emissions. In this paper, we investigate how prompt engineering techniques (PETs) can impact the carbon emission of the Llama 3 model for the code generation task. We experimented with the CodeXGLUE benchmark to evaluate both energy consumption and the accuracy of the generated code using an isolated testing environment. Our initial results show that the energy consumption of LLMs can be reduced by using specific tags that distinguish different prompt parts. Even though a more in-depth evaluation is needed to confirm our findings, this work suggests that prompt engineering can reduce LLMs' energy consumption during the inference phase without compromising performance, paving the way for further investigations.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections