Papers › Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Prompts

Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Prompts

18 Dec 2021CVPR 2022 1arXiv:2112.10003archive 2025-07-28

Timo Lüddecke, Alexander S. Ecker

Image segmentation is usually addressed by training a model for a fixed set of object classes. Incorporating additional classes or more complex queries later is expensive as it requires re-training the model on a dataset that encompasses these expressions. Here we propose a system that can generate image segmentations based on arbitrary prompts at test time. A prompt can be either a text or an image. This approach enables us to create a unified model (trained once) for three common segmentation tasks, which come with distinct challenges: referring expression segmentation, zero-shot segmentation and one-shot segmentation. We build upon the CLIP model as a backbone which we extend with a transformer-based decoder that enables dense prediction. After training on an extended version of the PhraseCut dataset, our system generates a binary segmentation map for an image based on a free-text prompt or on an additional image expressing the query. We analyze different variants of the latter image-based prompts in detail. This novel hybrid input allows for dynamic adaptation not only to the three segmentation tasks mentioned above, but to any binary segmentation task where a text or image query can be formulated. Finally, we find our system to adapt well to generalized queries involving affordances or properties. Code is available at https://eckerlab.org/code/clipseg.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2112.10003")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 2 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract.

By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

timojl/clipseg officialmentioned on GitHubpytorch report
casia-iva-lab/fastsam mentioned on GitHubpytorchAGPL-3.0 report
huggingface/transformers mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
openrobotlab/ov_parts mentioned on GitHubjax report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 1 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
1unverified

Licence: 2 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from timojl/clipseg. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

cosine_warmup_lr timojl/clipseg/training.py official repository ran · honoured contract fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 057d183d358d1e9a · report
get_cached_pascal_pfe timojl/clipseg/score.py official repository unverified licence not identified · pointer only · c78a6fe00b0a118f · report

Tasks

DecoderImage SegmentationMulti-modal image segmentationOne-Shot SegmentationReferring ExpressionReferring Expression SegmentationReferring Image Matting (Expression-based)Referring Image Matting (Keyword-based)Referring Image Matting (RefMatte-RW100)SegmentationSemantic SegmentationZero Shot Segmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Referring Image Matting (Expression-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MAD 0.0394 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Expression-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MAD(E) 0.0419 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Expression-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MSE 0.0358 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Expression-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MSE(E) 0.0381 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Expression-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) SAD 69.13 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Expression-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) SAD(E) 73.53 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Keyword-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MAD 0.0101 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Keyword-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MAD(E) 0.0106 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Keyword-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MSE 0.0064 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Keyword-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MSE(E) 0.0067 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Keyword-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) SAD 17.75 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (Keyword-based) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) SAD(E) 18.69 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (RefMatte-RW100) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MAD 0.1222 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (RefMatte-RW100) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MAD(E) 0.1282 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (RefMatte-RW100) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MSE 0.1178 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (RefMatte-RW100) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) MSE(E) 0.1236 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (RefMatte-RW100) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) SAD 211.86 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Referring Image Matting (RefMatte-RW100) RefMatte CLIPSeg (ViT-B/16) SAD(E) 222.37 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections