Papers › ProLFA: Representative Prototype Selection for Local Feature Aggregation

ProLFA: Representative Prototype Selection for Local Feature Aggregation

24 Oct 2019arXiv:1910.11010archive 2025-07-28

Xingxing Zhang, Zhenfeng Zhu, Yao Zhao

Given a set of hand-crafted local features, acquiring a global representation via aggregation is a promising technique to boost computational efficiency and improve task performance. Existing feature aggregation (FA) approaches, including Bag of Words and Fisher Vectors, usually fail to capture the desired information due to their pipeline mode. In this paper, we propose a generic formulation to provide a systematical solution (named ProLFA) to aggregate local descriptors. It is capable of producing compact yet interpretable representations by selecting representative prototypes from numerous descriptors, under relaxed exclusivity constraint. Meanwhile, to strengthen the discriminability of the aggregated representation, we rationally enforce the domain-invariant projection of bundled descriptors along a task-specific direction. Furthermore, ProLFA is also provided with a powerful generalization ability to deal flexibly with the semi-supervised and fully supervised scenarios in local feature aggregation. Experimental results on various descriptors and tasks demonstrate that the proposed ProLFA is considerably superior over currently available alternatives about feature aggregation.

PaperPDFCode

Code

indussky8/demo_ProLFA officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Computational EfficiencyPrototype Selection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections