Papers › ProcessorFuzz: Guiding Processor Fuzzing using Control and Status Registers
ProcessorFuzz: Guiding Processor Fuzzing using Control and Status Registers
Sadullah Canakci, Chathura Rajapaksha, Anoop Mysore Nataraja, Leila Delshadtehrani, Michael Taylor, Manuel Egele, Ajay Joshi
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
As the complexity of modern processors has increased over the years, developing effective verification strategies to identify bugs prior to manufacturing has become critical. Undiscovered micro-architectural bugs in processors can manifest as severe security vulnerabilities in the form of side channels, functional bugs, etc. Inspired by software fuzzing, a technique commonly used for software testing, multiple recent works use hardware fuzzing for the verification of Register-Transfer Level (RTL) designs. However, these works suffer from several limitations such as lack of support for widely-used Hardware Description Languages (HDLs) and misleading coverage-signals that misidentify "interesting" inputs. Towards overcoming these shortcomings, we present ProcessorFuzz, a processor fuzzer that guides the fuzzer with a novel CSR-transition coverage metric. ProcessorFuzz monitors the transitions in Control and Status Registers (CSRs) as CSRs are in charge of controlling and holding the state of the processor. Therefore, transitions in CSRs indicate a new processor state, and guiding the fuzzer based on this feedback enables ProcessorFuzz to explore new processor states. ProcessorFuzz is agnostic to the HDL and does not require any instrumentation in the processor design. Thus, it supports a wide range of RTL designs written in different hardware languages. We evaluated ProcessorFuzz with three real-world open-source processors -- Rocket, BOOM, and BlackParrot. ProcessorFuzz triggered a set of ground-truth bugs 1.23× faster (on average) than DIFUZZRTL. Moreover, our experiments exposed 8 new bugs across the three RISC-V cores and one new bug in a reference model. All nine bugs were confirmed by the developers of the corresponding projects.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections