Papers › Prior Effective Sample Size When Borrowing on the Treatment Effect Scale

Prior Effective Sample Size When Borrowing on the Treatment Effect Scale

20 Apr 2024arXiv:2404.13366links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Hongtao Zhang, Keaven M Anderson, Zachary Zimmer, Gregory Golm, Aditi Sapre, Joseph G Ibrahim

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

With the robust uptick in the applications of Bayesian external data borrowing, eliciting a prior distribution with the proper amount of information becomes increasingly critical. The prior effective sample size (ESS) is an intuitive and efficient measure for this purpose. The majority of ESS definitions have been proposed in the context of borrowing control information. While many Bayesian models can be naturally extended to leveraging external information on the treatment effect scale, very little attention has been directed to computing the prior ESS in this setting. In this research, we bridge this methodological gap by extending the popular ELIR ESS definition. We lay out the general framework, and derive the prior ESS for various types of endpoints and treatment effect measures. The posterior distribution and the predictive consistency property of ESS are also examined. The methods are implemented in R programs available on GitHub: https://github.com/squallteo/TrtEffESS.

PaperPDFCode

Code

squallteo/trteffess officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections