Papers › Principal component analysis of the Chandra ACIS gain

Principal component analysis of the Chandra ACIS gain

27 Jul 2021arXiv:2107.12810links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Hans Moritz Günther, Ákos Bogdán, Nick Durham

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Up to 2020, the Chandra ACIS gain has been calibrated using the External Calibration Source (ECS). The ECS consists of an Fe-55 radioactive source and is placed in the ACIS housing such that all chips are fully illuminated. Since the radioactive source decays over time with a half-life of 2.7 years, count rates are becoming too low for gain calibration. Instead, astrophysical calibration sources will be needed, which do not fill and illuminate the entire field of view. Here, we determine the dominant spatial components of the gain maps through principal component analysis (PCA). We find that, given the noise levels observed today, all ACIS gain maps can be sufficiently described by just a few (often only one) spatial components. We conclude that illuminating a small area is sufficient for gain calibration. We apply this to observations of the astrophysical source Cassiopeia A. The resulting calibration is found to be accurate to 0.6% in at least 68% of the chip area, following the same definition for the calibration accuracy that has been used since launch.

PaperPDFCode

Code

hamogu/dPHA officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections