Papers › Pre-trained Speech Representations as Feature Extractors for Speech Quality Assessment...
Pre-trained Speech Representations as Feature Extractors for Speech Quality Assessment in Online Conferencing Applications
Bastiaan Tamm, Helena Balabin, Rik Vandenberghe, Hugo Van hamme
Speech quality in online conferencing applications is typically assessed through human judgements in the form of the mean opinion score (MOS) metric. Since such a labor-intensive approach is not feasible for large-scale speech quality assessments in most settings, the focus has shifted towards automated MOS prediction through end-to-end training of deep neural networks (DNN). Instead of training a network from scratch, we propose to leverage the speech representations from the pre-trained wav2vec-based XLS-R model. However, the number of parameters of such a model exceeds task-specific DNNs by several orders of magnitude, which poses a challenge for resulting fine-tuning procedures on smaller datasets. Therefore, we opt to use pre-trained speech representations from XLS-R in a feature extraction rather than a fine-tuning setting, thereby significantly reducing the number of trainable model parameters. We compare our proposed XLS-R-based feature extractor to a Mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC)-based one, and experiment with various combinations of bidirectional long short term memory (Bi-LSTM) and attention pooling feedforward (AttPoolFF) networks trained on the output of the feature extractors. We demonstrate the increased performance of pre-trained XLS-R embeddings in terms a reduced root mean squared error (RMSE) on the ConferencingSpeech 2022 MOS prediction task.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections