Papers › Practical Parallel Algorithms for Near-Optimal Densest Subgraphs on Massive Graphs

Practical Parallel Algorithms for Near-Optimal Densest Subgraphs on Massive Graphs

7 Nov 2023arXiv:2311.04333links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Pattara Sukprasert, Quanquan C. Liu, Laxman Dhulipala, Julian Shun

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The densest subgraph problem has received significant attention, both in theory and in practice, due to its applications in problems such as community detection, social network analysis, and spam detection. Due to the high cost of obtaining exact solutions, much attention has focused on designing approximate densest subgraph algorithms. However, existing approaches are not able to scale to massive graphs with billions of edges. In this paper, we introduce a new framework that combines approximate densest subgraph algorithms with a pruning optimization. We design new parallel variants of the state-of-the-art sequential Greedy++ algorithm, and plug it into our framework in conjunction with a parallel pruning technique based on k-core decomposition to obtain parallel (1+ε)-approximate densest subgraph algorithms. On a single thread, our algorithms achieve $2.6$--34× speedup over Greedy++, and obtain up to 22.37× self relative parallel speedup on a 30-core machine with two-way hyper-threading. Compared with the state-of-the-art parallel algorithm by Harb et al. [NeurIPS'22], we achieve up to a 114× speedup on the same machine. Finally, against the recent sequential algorithm of Xu et al. [PACMMOD'23], we achieve up to a 25.9× speedup. The scalability of our algorithms enables us to obtain near-optimal density statistics on the hyperlink2012 (with roughly 113 billion edges) and clueweb (with roughly 37 billion edges) graphs for the first time in the literature.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from pattaras/gbbs. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections