Papers › Power analysis for cluster randomized trials with continuous co-primary endpoints
Power analysis for cluster randomized trials with continuous co-primary endpoints
Siyun Yang, Mirjam Moerbeek, Monica Taljaard, Fan Li
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Pragmatic trials evaluating health care interventions often adopt cluster randomization due to scientific or logistical considerations. Previous reviews have shown that co-primary endpoints are common in pragmatic trials but infrequently recognized in sample size or power calculations. While methods for power analysis based on K (K≥2) binary co-primary endpoints are available for CRTs, to our knowledge, methods for continuous co-primary endpoints are not yet available. Assuming a multivariate linear mixed model that accounts for multiple types of intraclass correlation coefficients (endpoint-specific ICCs, intra-subject ICCs and inter-subject between-endpoint ICCs) among the observations in each cluster, we derive the closed-form joint distribution of K treatment effect estimators to facilitate sample size and power determination with different types of null hypotheses under equal cluster sizes. We characterize the relationship between the power of each test and different types of correlation parameters. We further relax the equal cluster size assumption and approximate the joint distribution of the K treatment effect estimators through the mean and coefficient of variation of cluster sizes. Our simulation studies with a finite number of clusters indicate that the predicted power by our method agrees well with the empirical power, when the parameters in the multivariate linear mixed model are estimated via the expectation-maximization algorithm. An application to a real CRT is presented to illustrate the proposed method.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections