Papers › Potential Gravitational-wave and Gamma-ray Multi-messenger Candidate from Oct. 30, 2015
Potential Gravitational-wave and Gamma-ray Multi-messenger Candidate from Oct. 30, 2015
Alexander H. Nitz, Alex B. Nielsen, Collin D. Capano
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We present a search for binary neutron star mergers that produced gravitational-waves during the first observing run of Advanced LIGO and gamma-ray emission seen by either \textit{Swift}-BAT or Fermi-GBM, similar to GW170817 and GRB 170817A. We introduce a new method using a combined ranking statistic to detect sources that do not produce significant gravitational-wave or gamma-ray burst candidates individually. The current version of this search can increase by 70% the detections of joint gravitational-wave and gamma-ray signals. We find one possible candidate observed by LIGO and Fermi-GBM, 1-OGC 151030, at a false alarm rate of 1 in 13 years. If astrophysical, this candidate would correspond to a merger at 187⁺⁹⁹₋₈₇Mpc with source-frame chirp mass of 1.30^(+0.02)_(-0.03) M_⊙. If we assume the viewing angle must be <30° to be observed by \textit{Fermi}-GBM, our estimate of the distance would become 224⁺⁸⁸₋₇₈Mpc. By comparing the rate of binary neutron star mergers to our search-estimated rate of false alarms, we estimate that there is a 1 in 4 chance this candidate is astrophysical in origin.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections