Papers › Potential Gap: Using Reactive Policies to Guarantee Safe Navigation

Potential Gap: Using Reactive Policies to Guarantee Safe Navigation

21 Mar 2021arXiv:2103.11491links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Ruoyang Xu, Shiyu Feng, Patricio A. Vela

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

This paper considers the integration of gap-based local navigation methods with artificial potential field (APF) methods to derive a local planning module for hierarchical navigation systems that has provable collision-free properties. Given that APF theory applies to idealized robot models, the provable properties are lost when applied to more realistic models. We describe a set of algorithm modifications that correct for these errors and enhance robustness to non-ideal models. Central to the construction of the local planner is the use of sensory-derived local free-space models that detect gaps and use them for the synthesis of the APF. Modifications are given for a nonholonomic robot model. Integration of the local planner, called potential gap, into a hierarchical navigation system provides the local goals and trajectories needed for collision-free navigation through unknown environments. Monte Carlo experiments in benchmark worlds confirm the asserted safety and robustness properties by testing under various robot models.

PaperPDFCode

Code

ivaROS/potential_gap officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
ivaROS/PotentialGap mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections