Papers › Position: More Rigorous Software Engineering Would Improve Reproducibility in Machine...
Position: More Rigorous Software Engineering Would Improve Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research
Moritz Wolter, Lokesh Veeramacheneni
Experimental verification and falsification of scholarly work are part of the scientific method's core. To improve the Machine Learning (ML)-communities' ability to verify results from prior work, we argue for more robust software engineering. We estimate the adoption of common engineering best practices by examining repository links from all recently accepted International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) and Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) papers as well as ICML papers over time. Based on the results, we recommend how we, as a community, can improve reproducibility in ML-research.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections