Papers › Population Effects Driving Active Material Degradation in Intercalation Electrodes

Population Effects Driving Active Material Degradation in Intercalation Electrodes

19 Jan 2023arXiv:2301.07892links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Debbie Zhuang, Martin Z. Bazant

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

In battery modeling, the electrode is discretized at the macroscopic scale with a single representative particle in each volume. This lacks the accurate physics to describe interparticle interactions in electrodes. To remedy this, we formulate a model that describes the evolution of degradation of a population of battery active material particles using ideas in population genetics of fitness evolution, where the state of a system depends on the health of each particle that contributes to the system. With the fitness formulation, the model incorporates effects of particle size and heterogeneous degradation effects which accumulate in the particles as the battery is cycled, accounting for different active material degradation mechanisms. At the particle scale, degradation progresses nonuniformly across the population of active particles, observed from the autocatalytic relationship between fitness and degradation. Electrode-level degradation is formed from various contributions of the particle-level degradation, especially from smaller particles. It is shown that specific mechanisms of particle-level degradation can be associated with characteristic signatures in the capacity-loss and voltage profiles. Conversely, certain features in the electrode-level phenomena can also provide insight into the relative importance of different particle-level degradation mechanisms.

PaperPDFCode

Code

lightningclaw001/public_paper_scripts officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections