Papers › POLITICS: Pretraining with Same-story Article Comparison for Ideology Prediction and...

POLITICS: Pretraining with Same-story Article Comparison for Ideology Prediction and Stance Detection

2 May 2022Findings (NAACL) 2022 7arXiv:2205.00619archive 2025-07-28

Yujian Liu, Xinliang Frederick Zhang, David Wegsman, Nick Beauchamp, Lu Wang

Ideology is at the core of political science research. Yet, there still does not exist general-purpose tools to characterize and predict ideology across different genres of text. To this end, we study Pretrained Language Models using novel ideology-driven pretraining objectives that rely on the comparison of articles on the same story written by media of different ideologies. We further collect a large-scale dataset, consisting of more than 3.6M political news articles, for pretraining. Our model POLITICS outperforms strong baselines and the previous state-of-the-art models on ideology prediction and stance detection tasks. Further analyses show that POLITICS is especially good at understanding long or formally written texts, and is also robust in few-shot learning scenarios.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

launchnlp/politics officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchNOASSERTION report
lyh6560new/p3sum mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ArticlesFew-Shot LearningStance Detection

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

BigNews

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections