Papers › PointNetPGAP-SLC: A 3D LiDAR-based Place Recognition Approach with Segment-level...

PointNetPGAP-SLC: A 3D LiDAR-based Place Recognition Approach with Segment-level Consistency Training for Mobile Robots in Horticulture

29 May 2024arXiv:2405.19038links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

T. Barros, L. Garrote, P. Conde, M. J. Coombes, C. Liu, C. Premebida, U. J. Nunes

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

3D LiDAR-based place recognition remains largely underexplored in horticultural environments, which present unique challenges due to their semi-permeable nature to laser beams. This characteristic often results in highly similar LiDAR scans from adjacent rows, leading to descriptor ambiguity and, consequently, compromised retrieval performance. In this work, we address the challenges of 3D LiDAR place recognition in horticultural environments, particularly focusing on inter-row ambiguity by introducing three key contributions: (i) a novel model, PointNetPGAP, which combines the outputs of two statistically-inspired aggregators into a single descriptor; (ii) a Segment-Level Consistency (SLC) model, used exclusively during training to enhance descriptor robustness; and (iii) the HORTO-3DLM dataset, comprising LiDAR sequences from orchards and strawberry fields. Experimental evaluations conducted on the HORTO-3DLM and KITTI Odometry datasets demonstrate that PointNetPGAP outperforms state-of-the-art models, including OverlapTransformer and PointNetVLAD, particularly when the SLC model is applied. These results underscore the model's superiority, especially in horticultural environments, by significantly improving retrieval performance in segments with higher ambiguity.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Cybonic/HORTO-3DLM officialmentioned in papertf report
Cybonic/PointNetPGAP-SLC officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections