Papers › Point-Set Registration: Coherent Point Drift

Point-Set Registration: Coherent Point Drift

15 May 2009arXiv:0905.2635archive 2025-07-28

Andriy Myronenko, Xubo Song

Point set registration is a key component in many computer vision tasks. The goal of point set registration is to assign correspondences between two sets of points and to recover the transformation that maps one point set to the other. Multiple factors, including an unknown non-rigid spatial transformation, large dimensionality of point set, noise and outliers, make the point set registration a challenging problem. We introduce a probabilistic method, called the Coherent Point Drift (CPD) algorithm, for both rigid and non-rigid point set registration. We consider the alignment of two point sets as a probability density estimation problem. We fit the GMM centroids (representing the first point set) to the data (the second point set) by maximizing the likelihood. We force the GMM centroids to move coherently as a group to preserve the topological structure of the point sets. In the rigid case, we impose the coherence constraint by re-parametrization of GMM centroid locations with rigid parameters and derive a closed form solution of the maximization step of the EM algorithm in arbitrary dimensions. In the non-rigid case, we impose the coherence constraint by regularizing the displacement field and using the variational calculus to derive the optimal transformation. We also introduce a fast algorithm that reduces the method computation complexity to linear. We test the CPD algorithm for both rigid and non-rigid transformations in the presence of noise, outliers and missing points, where CPD shows accurate results and outperforms current state-of-the-art methods.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="0905.2635")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 9 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 9 samples from 2 repositories, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

BioMechTools/DKCT_Quatitative_Measurement mentioned on GitHubApache-2.0 report
BioMechTools/QDKCT mentioned on GitHubApache-2.0 report
bing-jian/gmmreg mentioned on GitHub report
siavashk/pycpd mentioned on GitHubMIT report
unibas-gravis/gingr mentioned on GitHubApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran · our draft was wrong
1ran · fixture could not drive it
5unverified

Licence: 4 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_all_depth_files bing-jian/gmmreg/expts/lounge_expts.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · c6200a94efe2504f · report
load_dragon_conf bing-jian/gmmreg/expts/dragon_expts.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · fbb317e15933ad51 · report
lookup_ground_truth bing-jian/gmmreg/expts/dragon_expts.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 3cfb735736ac67dc · report
parse_ground_truth bing-jian/gmmreg/expts/lounge_expts.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · b681159f7c462b42 · report
gaussian_kernel siavashk/pycpd/pycpd/utility.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 4f1931c292e385c7 · report
initialize_sigma2 siavashk/pycpd/pycpd/emregistration.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 0daf328762616aa0 · report
is_positive_semi_definite siavashk/pycpd/pycpd/utility.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 450b52b2868095cc · report
low_rank_eigen siavashk/pycpd/pycpd/utility.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 178f55aff7e2a1f5 · report
lowrankQS siavashk/pycpd/pycpd/emregistration.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 6fd86a3e72cbbb60 · report

Tasks

Density Estimation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections