Papers › Pick your Neighbor: Local Gauss-Southwell Rule for Fast Asynchronous Decentralized Optimization
Pick your Neighbor: Local Gauss-Southwell Rule for Fast Asynchronous Decentralized Optimization
Marina Costantini, Nikolaos Liakopoulos, Panayotis Mertikopoulos, Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos
In decentralized optimization environments, each agent i in a network of n nodes has its own private function fᵢ, and nodes communicate with their neighbors to cooperatively minimize the aggregate objective ∑ᵢ₌₁ⁿ fᵢ. In this setting, synchronizing the nodes' updates incurs significant communication overhead and computational costs, so much of the recent literature has focused on the analysis and design of asynchronous optimization algorithms, where agents activate and communicate at arbitrary times without needing a global synchronization enforcer. However, most works assume that when a node activates, it selects the neighbor to contact based on a fixed probability (e.g., uniformly at random), a choice that ignores the optimization landscape at the moment of activation. Instead, in this work we introduce an optimization-aware selection rule that chooses the neighbor providing the highest dual cost improvement (a quantity related to a dualization of the problem based on consensus). This scheme is related to the coordinate descent (CD) method with the Gauss-Southwell (GS) rule for coordinate updates; in our setting however, only a subset of coordinates is accessible at each iteration (because each node can communicate only with its neighbors), so the existing literature on GS methods does not apply. To overcome this difficulty, we develop a new analytical framework for smooth and strongly convex fᵢ that covers the class of set-wise CD algorithms -- a class that directly applies to decentralized scenarios, but is not limited to them -- and we show that the proposed set-wise GS rule achieves a speedup factor of up to the maximum degree in the network (which is in the order of Θ(n) for highly connected graphs). The speedup predicted by our analysis is validated in numerical experiments with synthetic data.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections